JOIN THE MOVEMENT
Prove demographics don’t
have to be destiny

We can’t remake our public schools without you.

Spaces are allowed; punctuation is not allowed except for periods, hyphens, and underscores.


CONTRIBUTE
Fix poverty by fixing schools

ConnCAN needs your support right now to make sure that every child in Connecticut, regardless of race, ethnicity, or class, has access to a great public school.

In the News

Time to stop whining and make serious education reforms

August 31, 2010
Hartford Courant

By Rick Green

Maybe you saw what New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie did last week after he learned about the bungling behind his administration's failure to win $400 million in the federal Race to the Top competition that rewards states that adopt aggressive education reforms.

Christie fired his education commissioner.

Bravo. At least we know what matters to Gov. Christie, a Republican making waves across the country. That's more than I can say for Connecticut, land of timid leadership.

Hwang to receive education award tomorrow at Fairfield U.

August 30, 2010
Trumbull Times

By Donald Eng

Conn. learns why it lost out on fed funds

August 28, 2010
New Haven Register

By Abbe Smith

In the most recent round of federal Race to the Top awards, Connecticut scored lower than every state it borders.

The state learned last month that it did not make the list of finalists, but didn’t get details about why it missed out on the $175 million it was seeking until final scores and reviewer comments were released this week.

State's teacher evaluation plans too weak, federal reviewers say

August 25, 2010
Connecticut Mirror

By Robert Frahm

The weakness of a plan to link teacher evaluations to student performance was a key factor in Connecticut's failure to qualify for millions of dollars in federal school aid, according to a government report released Wednesday.

The proposed evaluation system lacks detail, won't be ready for years, and fails to include adequate provisions for rewarding successful teachers or removing ineffective ones, said reviewers for the U.S. Department of Education's Race to the Top school reform competition.

The business of education

August 25, 2010
Connecticut Business News Journal

By Melissa Nicefaro

In every Connecticut city and town, public education is by far the largest budget item. Yet the schools’ stewards don’t always treat those dollars as their own

When terms such as “layoffs,” “closures” and “belt-tightening” are tossed around, the education industry may not be the first that comes to mind. That was true until this year, anyway.

Social Networking
Twitter Feed is down, Please try again later
Talk to us on
What We Believe

How it all fits together for commonsense education reform.

We believe that getting state policy right can transform the way we educate Connecticut’s children. This does not mean trying to write every best practice into state law, but instead advancing three fundamental, self-reinforcing principles that work together to reward success, punish failure and raise the quality of everything in between:

 

  • Greater Choices. Achievement gaps stem from a calcified education system resistant to the innovations of educators and the desires of parents. Expanded parental choice better aligns school options with diverse student needs and injects a grassroots level of accountability into the system. We believe that all types of public schools—traditional public schools, public charter schools, magnet schools and technical schools—hold the potential to fulfill our obligation as a society to provide an excellent education to all students.
 
  • Greater Accountability. Parental choice provides one important type of accountability, but it is not the only one necessary to ensure educational equality. Over the past twenty years we have made significant strides in developing and implementing state standards and student assessment systems rooted in these standards. Now we need to use the information collected through these systems to dramatically expand public awareness of school performance, ground teacher evaluations in student results, and close chronically failing schools.
 
  • Greater Flexibility. No Child Left Behind increased accountability for America’s superintendents and principals, but it did not provide them with additional flexibility to meet this higher standard for results. In order for greater choices and greater accountability to translate into greater student achievement, America’s educators need to have far greater flexibility in how they run their districts and their schools. This flexibility means expanding alternative pathways to serving as a teacher and principal, providing principals with the ability to make all staffing decisions concerning their schools, and focusing funding on simple formulas tied to student needs without top-down mandates and restrictions.
 

 

Share |